COLLABORATIVE CRIT
At the beginning of the session we began by pitching our concept to the rest of the group we were in the same groups as last weeks 3 pairs. We began by talking through some layouts we had put together , some from covers & a board with our next concept proposed over a magazine and a app.
Once we had pitched our ideas to each other we then swapped with the pair clockwise and took there work and went through thoroughly answering the following questions.
- Comment on the effectiveness of the concept.Does it address the problems indented in the brief? suggestions
- Comment on the design direction and decisions made regarding the production and distribution of the response - suggestions
- Comment on what you would do differently and why?
- If money and time were no object how far would you do with the brief based on what has been presented?
- What contextual references can you suggest will be relevant to the proposal?
Me and my partner Beth looked Joes & Alexs work we felt we gave them feedback when they pitched but after having a thorough look we managed to leave them a reasonable amount of feedback good points and some considerations. I felt this crit was beneficial.
OUR FEEDBACK
Me and Beth had our work looked at by Tristan & Bobby we received through feedback they brought points to our attention we hadn't looked at.
OUR FEEDBACK
Me and Beth had our work looked at by Tristan & Bobby we received through feedback they brought points to our attention we hadn't looked at.
MAIN POINTS -
- Our strengths were the re-branding & layout decisions
- Consider not to worry about the content to much but the style its put in
- Design style is going in the right direction as the now visual identity appears to be more modern.
- Consider northern appreciation
- Try different grid for text
- Bigger promotion campaign.
No comments:
Post a Comment